Blog Post #9 Locke and Hume
Thanks to political thinkers like Locke and Hume, we live in
a time that abounds in freedom. Though Locke’s ideas on acceptable slavery
would not work today (as the U.N. would likely not allow conquered people to
become slaves) his statement still holds true: “The natural liberty of man is
to be free from any superior power on earth and not to be under the will or legislative
authority of man, but have only the law of nature for his rule.” Of course,
this law of nature is given up when we accept a society but I believe it is a
necessary trade deal considering that so few of us nowadays could actually live
in the wilderness. This acceptance over to society, however, does not mean oppression.
This society, according to Locke, is meant to protect us and our property. That is why we have the Fifth Amendment
today. Moving on to Hume, though I completely agree with his freedom of the
press, I also believe there are dangers without restrictions. Hume’s ideas work
in a rational society, however, what happens when a large portion of the
population willfully believes lies? I think propaganda has no place in the
news. It should not be up to the government to deem what is and isn’t
propaganda, but by a neutral third party, without affiliation to political
groups, to observe the observable reality and to choose which publications reflect
that observable reality accurately. Though we as college students are taught to
check our sources, many Americans do not. This created a schism in the
perception of life within this country. Initially, it seemed a thing relegated
to online forums, but has now spread out into the real world. The freedom of
the press is vital to society; freedom of propaganda, is not.
Comments
Post a Comment